MOORE v. U S EX REL NEWCOMB MOTOR COAnnotate this Case
216 U.S. 608
U.S. Supreme Court
MOORE v. U S EX REL NEWCOMB MOTOR CO, 216 U.S. 608 (1910)
216 U.S. 608
EDWARD B. MOORE, Commissioner of Patents, Plaintiff in Error,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. NEWCOMB MOTOR COMPANY.
Supreme Court of the United States
March 7, 1910
Messrs. Frederick P. Fish, Melville Church, and Albert G. Davis for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Charles H. Duell, Robert N. Kenyon, and Walter F. Rogers for defendant in error.
Per Curiam: The Writ of Error is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Frasch v. Moore, 211 U.S. 1, 53 L. ed. 65, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 6; Rousseau v. Brown, 21 App. D. C. 73, 80; Johnson v. Mueser, 212 U.S. 284, 53 L. ed. 515, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 390; E. C. Atkins & Co. v. Moore, 212 U.S. 285, 53 L. ed. 515, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 390; Gaines v. Knecht, 212 U.S. 561, 53 L. ed. 652, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 688; Gaines v. Knecht, 27 App. D. C. 530, 532; United States ex rel. Taylor v. Taft, 203 U.S. 461, 51 L. ed. 269, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 148; United States v. Lynch, 137 U.S. 280, 34 L. ed. 700, 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 114; Baltimore & P. R. Co. v. Hopkins, 130 U.S. 210, 226, 32 S. L. ed. 908, 914, 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 503. The application for Certiorari is also denied.
Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.