Ex Parte Kearney
20 U.S. 38 (1822)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Ex Parte Kearney, 20 U.S. 7 Wheat. 38 38 (1822)

Ex Parte Kearney

20 U.S. (7 Wheat.) 38

Syllabus

This Court has authority to issue a habeas corpus where a person is imprisoned under the warrant or order of any other court of the United States.

But this Court has no appellate jurisdiction in criminal cases confided to it by the laws of the United States, and cannot revise the judgments of the circuit courts by writ of error in any case where a party has been convicted of a public offense.

Hence the Court will not grant a habeas corpus where a party has been committed for a contempt adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction.

In such a case, this Court will not inquire into the sufficiency of the cause of commitment.

The case of Crosby, Lord Mayor of London, 3 Wils. 108, commented on, and its authority confirmed.

Mr. Jones moved for a habeas corpus to bring up the body of John T. Kearney, now in jail, in the custody of the marshal, under a commitment of the Circuit Court for the District of Columbia for an alleged contempt. The petition stated that on the trial of an indictment in that court, the petitioner was examined as a witness, and refused to answer a certain question which was put to him, because he conceived it tended materially to implicate him, and to criminate him as a particeps criminis. The objection was overruled by the court, and he having persisted in refusing to answer the question, was committed to jail for the supposed contempt, and for no other cause.

Page 20 U. S. 41

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.