Shoshone Mining Co. v. Rutter
177 U.S. 505 (1900)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Shoshone Mining Co. v. Rutter, 177 U.S. 505 (1900)

Shoshone Mining Co. v. Rutter

No. 208

Argued March 21, 1900

Decided April 30, 1900

177 U.S. 505

Syllabus

A suit brought in support of an adverse claim under Rev.Stat. §§ 2325, 2326, is not a suit arising under the laws of the United States in such a sense as to confer jurisdiction on a federal court, regardless of the citizenship of the parties.

Blackburn v. Portland Gold Mining Co.,175 U. S. 571, reexamined and affirmed to this point.

Although suits like the present one may sometimes so present questions arising under the Constitution or laws of the United States that a federal court will have jurisdiction, yet the mere fact that a suit is an adverse suit, authorized by the statutes of Congress, is not, in and of itself, sufficient to vest jurisdiction in the federal courts.

The case is stated in the opinion.

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.