Kansas City, L. & So. Kans. R. Co. v. Attorney General
118 U.S. 682 (1886)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Kansas City, L. & So. Kans. R. Co. v. Attorney General, 118 U.S. 682 (1886)

Kansas City, Lawrence, and South Kansas

Railroad Company v. Attorney General

Argued October 18-19, 1886

Decided November 8, 1886

118 U.S. 682

Syllabus

The Acts of Congress of March 3, 1863, 12 Stat. 772; July 1, 18G4, 13 Stat. 339, and July 26, 1866, 14 Stat. 289, granting lands to the State of Kansas for railroad purposes, are to be construed in pari materia, and as having the one purpose of building a single road from Fort Riley, down the Neosho Valley, to the southern line of that state, and not as distinct grants for different roads, which may come in conflict in the claims under them in regard to the lands granted.

The junction of this road with the one from Leavenworth by way of Lawrence in the direction of Galveston Bay, as provided in the act of 1863, was not required to be on the very crest of the Neosho Valley as reached by the latter road, but at a convenient point for such crossing in the narrow valley of the Neosho River, and as this point has been adopted by the companies building both roads, and accepted by the officers of the Land Department in selecting indemnity lands, there is no sufficient reason to be found in the point of junction to vacate the certification of these lands to the state for the company which has built the road and received the patents of the state.

Nor is there any other sufficient reason found in the record in this case for setting aside the evidences of title to these lands issued to the corporation which built the road within the time required by law, to the approval of the officers of the government whose primary duty it was to certify these lands and who did so within the scope of their powers.

This was a bill in equity brought by the Attorney General of the United States to quiet the title to certain lands in Kansas.

Page 118 U. S. 683

The decree below was in favor of the Attorney General, from which the railroad company appealed. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

Page 118 U. S. 685

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.