Cambria Iron Company v. Ashburn
118 U.S. 54 (1886)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Cambria Iron Company v. Ashburn, 118 U.S. 54 (1886)

Cambria Iron Company v. Ashburn

Submitted April 5, 1886

Decided April 19, 1886

118 U.S. 54

Syllabus

United States v. Bowen,100 U. S. 508, affirmed to the point that where the meaning of the Revised Statutes is plain, the court cannot recur to the original statutes to see if errors were committed in revising them, but it may do so, when necessary to construe doubtful language used in the revision.

Jefferson v. Driver,117 U. S. 272, affirmed and applied to the point that the removal of a cause from a state court on the ground of local prejudice can be had only where all the parties to the suit on one side are citizens of different states from those on the other, and that the provision as to the removal of a separable controversy under the second subdivision of Rev.Stat. § 639 has no application to removals under the third subdivision.

This was an appeal from an order remanding the cause to the state court from whence it had been removed. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

Page 118 U. S. 55

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.