Johnson v. Social Security Administration Commissioner, No. 5:2023cv00256 - Document 32 (N.D. Tex. 2024)

Court Description: Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations: The Court has further conducted an independent review of the Magistrate Judge's findings and conclusions and finds no error. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendat ion are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated therein, the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED and Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 5/6/2024) (bdg)

Download PDF
Johnson v. Social Security Administration Commissioner Doc. 32 IN THE LNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUBBOCK DIVISION DARRIN J..I ) ) ) ) ) Plaintifi COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY. Def'endant ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 5:23-CV-256-C-BT ORDE,R Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge therein advising the Court that the decision of the Commissioner should be affirmed. Plaintifffailed to timely file any objections and the time for doing so has expired. The Court conducts ade novo review olthose portions of the Magistrate Judge's report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which a timely objection is made. 28 U.S.C. $ 636(bX I XC). Portions of the report or proposed findings or recommendations that are not the subject ofa timely objection will be accepted by the Court unless they are clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See United States v. Iltilson,864 F.2d 1219,1221 (5th Cir. 1989) The Court has fu(her conducted an independent review ofthe Magistrate Judge's findings and conclusions and finds no error. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. I To protect privacy concerns of plaintiffs in social security cases, the undersigned identifies the Plaintiffonly by first name and last initial. Dockets.Justia.com For the reasons stated therein, the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED and Plaintiff s Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. SO ORD ERED. r r,lL Dated thi "b day of May,2024. ?'??t'zt GS st'Nrdn STATES CT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.