Valerie Steiner v. M & H Appliances, No. 23-3562 (8th Cir. 2024)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-3562 ___________________________ Valerie Steiner lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. M & H Appliances Sales and Service lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________ Submitted: April 30, 2024 Filed: May 3, 2024 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, SMITH, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Valerie Steiner, a former employee of M & H Appliances Sales and Service, appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her pro se 1 The Honorable Nancy E. Brasel, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. employment action. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that the grant of summary judgment was proper. See Collins v. Kansas City Mo. Pub. Sch. Dist., 92 F.4th 770, 770 (8th Cir. 2024) (reviewing grant of summary judgment de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.