Bourne v. Goodyear,
76 U.S. 811 (1869)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Bourne v. Goodyear, 76 U.S. 9 Wall. 811 811 (1869)

Bourne v. Goodyear

76 U.S. (9 Wall.) 811




A proceeding to vacate the extension of a patent, of which the extension has expired before the proceeding was begun, has no equity to support it, and cannot be sustained on demurrer.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York, in which court, on the 15th of June, 1865, a proceeding was begun, in the name of the United States ex Relatione Bourne against the Executor of Goodyear to vacate an extension of a patent. The bill showed that the extension of the patent sought to be vacated by the proceeding expired on the 14th of June, 1865, before the suit was commenced, and the defendant demurred to it on that ground among others. The court below dismissed the bill, and the relator brought the case here.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE delivered the opinion of the Court.

The extension having expired before the bill was filed, there is no equity to support the application to set it aside. The extension has ceased to be of any effect, and there remains nothing which can be the subject of a suit. The demurrer to the bill therefore must be sustained, and the decree of the circuit court by which the bill was dismissed must be


Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.