Sigerson v. Mathews,
61 U.S. 496 (1857)

Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Sigerson v. Mathews, 61 U.S. 20 How. 496 496 (1857)

Sigerson v. Mathews

61 U.S. (20 How.) 496


Where the endorser of a promissory note, in conversation with the agent of the holder, before its maturity, dispensed with a presentation of the note and demand of payment, and promised to pay it, or provide for its payment, at maturity, he could not, when sued, set up as a defense that the note was not presented for payment and demand made therefor when it was due, and that no notice of its dishonor was given.

If, after the maturity of the note, the endorser promised the agent of the holder to pay the same, having at the time of making such promise knowledge of the fact that the note had not been presented for payment, and no demand made therefor or notice of nonpayment, he could not, when sued, set up as a defense a want of such demand or notice.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

Page 61 U. S. 498

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.