Carroll v. Dorsey,
61 U.S. 204 (1857)

Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Carroll v. Dorsey, 61 U.S. 20 How. 204 204 (1857)

Carroll v. Dorsey

61 U.S. (20 How.) 204


Although an irregularity in the citation may be cured by an appearance in court, yet a defect in the writ of error, such as not naming a return day for the writ, or an omission to file a transcript of the record at the term next succeeding the issuing of the writ or the taking of the appeal, are fatal errors, and the case must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Page 61 U. S. 206

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.