Cox v. United States, 585 U.S. ___ (2018)
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
LAITH G. COX, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES
COURTNEY A. CRAIG, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES
ANDREW K. LEWIS, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES
IAN T. MILLER, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES
JOSEPH D. MORCHINEK, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES
KELVIN L. O’SHAUGHNESSY, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES
on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the armed forces
[June 22, 2018]
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
It is so ordered.
|February 21, 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 27, 2017)|
|March 22, 2017||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including April 26, 2017.|
|April 19, 2017||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including May 15, 2017.|
|May 15, 2017||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|May 19, 2017||Reply of petitioner Laith G. Cox filed. VIDED.|
|September 6, 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/25/2017.|
|September 28, 2017||Petition GRANTED, and the petitions for writs of certiorari in Nos. 16-961 and 16-1423 are granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. In addition to the questions presented by the petitions, the parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: Whether this Court has jurisdiction to review the cases in Nos. 16-961 and 16-1017 under 28 U. S. C. § 1259(3).|
|November 7, 2017||Joint appendix filed. VIDED. (Statement of costs filed)|
|November 7, 2017||Brief of petitioners filed. VIDED.|
|November 14, 2017||Brief amicus curiae of Aditya Bamzai in support of neither party filed. VIDED.|
|November 17, 2017||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, January 16, 2018. VIDED|
|November 22, 2017||CIRCULATED.|
|December 7, 2017||Brief of respondent United States filed. VIDED.
|December 14, 2017||Motion of Aditya Bamzai for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed. VIDED.|
|December 18, 2017||Record requested from the U.S.C.A for the Armed Forces.|
|January 5, 2018||Motion of Professor Aditya Bamzai for enlargement of time for oral argument, for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED, and the time is divided as follows: 30 minutes for petitioners, 10 minutes for Professor Aditya Bamzai, and 30 minutes for respondent. VIDED|
|January 5, 2018||Reply of petitioner Laith G.Cox filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
|January 8, 2018||Record received from the U.S.C.A. for the Armed Forces. (2 Boxes). Box 2 of 2 is SEALED.|
|January 10, 2018||Letter of respondent United States filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
|January 16, 2018||Argued. For petitioners: Stephen I. Vladeck, Austin, Tex. For Professor Aditya Bamzai as amicus curiae: Aditya Bamzai, Charlottesville, VA. For respondent: Brian H. Fletcher, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. VIDED.|
|June 22, 2018||Writ of certiorari DISMISSED as improvidently granted. Opinion per curiam.|
|June 25, 2018||The record from the Department of the Army has been returned.|
|July 24, 2018||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.