CORY v. WESTERN OIL & GAS ASSN., 471 U.S. 81 (1985)

U.S. Supreme Court

CORY v. WESTERN OIL & GAS ASSN., 471 U.S. 81 (1985)

471 U.S. 81

CORY ET AL. v. WESTERN OIL & GAS ASSN. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No. 84-16.

Argued February 26, 1985
Decided March 27, 1985

Dennis M. Eagan, Deputy Attorney General of California, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, and N. Gregory Taylor, Assistant Attorney General.

Philip K. Verleger argued the cause for appellees. With him on the brief was John P. Zaimes.*

[Footnote *] A brief of amici curiae urging reversal was filed for the City of Santa Monica et al. by Robert M. Myers, Karl M. Manheim, Bert Glennon, Jr., and Stanley E. Remelmeyer.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the decision of this case.

Page 471 U.S. 81, 82




U.S. Supreme Court

CORY v. WESTERN OIL & GAS ASSN., 471 U.S. 81 (1985)

471 U.S. 81

CORY ET AL. v. WESTERN OIL & GAS ASSN. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No. 84-16.

Argued February 26, 1985
Decided March 27, 1985

Dennis M. Eagan, Deputy Attorney General of California, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, and N. Gregory Taylor, Assistant Attorney General.

Philip K. Verleger argued the cause for appellees. With him on the brief was John P. Zaimes.*

[Footnote *] A brief of amici curiae urging reversal was filed for the City of Santa Monica et al. by Robert M. Myers, Karl M. Manheim, Bert Glennon, Jr., and Stanley E. Remelmeyer.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the decision of this case.

Page 471 U.S. 81, 82

Oral Argument - February 26, 1985
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.