UNITED STATES v. JACOBS, 436 U.S. 31 (1978)

U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED STATES v. JACOBS, 436 U.S. 31 (1978)

436 U.S. 31

UNITED STATES v. JACOBS, AKA "MRS. KRAMER"
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
 
No. 76-1193.
 
Argued December 7, 1977 Reargued March 20, 1978
Decided May 1, 1978

Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 547 F.2d 772.

Deputy Solicitor General Frey reargued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General McCree, Assistant Attorney General Civiletti, William F. Sheehan III, and Jerome M. Feit.

Irving P. Seidman reargued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Page 436 U.S. 31, 32

 


U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED STATES v. JACOBS, 436 U.S. 31 (1978)

436 U.S. 31

UNITED STATES v. JACOBS, AKA "MRS. KRAMER"
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
 
No. 76-1193.
 
Argued December 7, 1977 Reargued March 20, 1978
Decided May 1, 1978

Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 547 F.2d 772.

Deputy Solicitor General Frey reargued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General McCree, Assistant Attorney General Civiletti, William F. Sheehan III, and Jerome M. Feit.

Irving P. Seidman reargued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Page 436 U.S. 31, 32

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.