Shell Oil Co. v. Dartt, 434 U.S. 99 (1977)
Argued:
November 7, 1977
Decided:
November 29, 1977
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
SHELL OIL CO. v. DARTT, 434 U.S. 99 (1977) 434 U.S. 99SHELL OIL CO. v. DARTT
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH
CIRCUIT
No. 76-678.
Argued November 7, 1977
Decided November 29, 1977
539 F.2d 1256, affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Mary T. Matthies argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs was Brynn F. Aurelius.
Jefferson G. Greer argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.*
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
[Footnote *] Jay S. Siegel, Frank C. Morris, Jr., Robert E. Williams, and Douglas S. McDowell filed a brief for the Equal Employment Advisory Council as amicus curiae urging reversal.
Opinions
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
No. 76-678.
Argued November 7, 1977
Decided November 29, 1977
539 F.2d 1256, affirmed by an equally divided Court. Mary T. Matthies argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs was Brynn F. Aurelius. Jefferson G. Greer argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.* PER CURIAM. The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court. MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. [Footnote *] Jay S. Siegel, Frank C. Morris, Jr., Robert E. Williams, and Douglas S. McDowell filed a brief for the Equal Employment Advisory Council as amicus curiae urging reversal. Page 434 U.S. 99, 100
U.S. Supreme Court
SHELL OIL CO. v. DARTT, 434 U.S. 99 (1977) 434 U.S. 99 SHELL OIL CO. v. DARTTCERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
No. 76-678.
Argued November 7, 1977
Decided November 29, 1977
539 F.2d 1256, affirmed by an equally divided Court. Mary T. Matthies argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs was Brynn F. Aurelius. Jefferson G. Greer argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.* PER CURIAM. The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court. MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. [Footnote *] Jay S. Siegel, Frank C. Morris, Jr., Robert E. Williams, and Douglas S. McDowell filed a brief for the Equal Employment Advisory Council as amicus curiae urging reversal. Page 434 U.S. 99, 100
Search This Case
