Shell Oil Co. v. Dartt, 434 U.S. 99 (1977)
U.S. Supreme Court
SHELL OIL CO. v. DARTT, 434 U.S. 99 (1977)
434 U.S. 99 SHELL OIL CO. v. DARTT
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
No. 76-678.
Argued November 7, 1977
Decided November 29, 1977
539 F.2d 1256, affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Mary T. Matthies argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs was Brynn F. Aurelius.
Jefferson G. Greer argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.*
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
[Footnote *] Jay S. Siegel, Frank C. Morris, Jr., Robert E. Williams, and Douglas S. McDowell filed a brief for the Equal Employment Advisory Council as amicus curiae urging reversal.
U.S. Supreme Court
SHELL OIL CO. v. DARTT, 434 U.S. 99 (1977)
434 U.S. 99 SHELL OIL CO. v. DARTT
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
No. 76-678.
Argued November 7, 1977
Decided November 29, 1977
539 F.2d 1256, affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Mary T. Matthies argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs was Brynn F. Aurelius.
Jefferson G. Greer argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.*
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
[Footnote *] Jay S. Siegel, Frank C. Morris, Jr., Robert E. Williams, and Douglas S. McDowell filed a brief for the Equal Employment Advisory Council as amicus curiae urging reversal.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
