BASSETT v. SMITH, 398 U.S. 435 (1970)

U.S. Supreme Court

BASSETT v. SMITH, 398 U.S. 435 (1970)

398 U.S. 435

BASSETT v. SMITH, WARDEN
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA
No. 1658, Misc.
Decided June 15, 1970

Certiorari granted; 226 Ga. 10, 172 S.E.2d 407, vacated and remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Georgia affirming the denial of habeas corpus is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration after petitioner has been afforded adequate access to a copy of the transcript of the trial court hearing on his petition for habeas corpus. Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477 (1963); Long v. District Court, 385 U.S. 192 (1966); cf. Wade v. Wilson, 396 U.S. 282 (1970).

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL and MR. JUSTICE BLACKMUN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 398 U.S. 435, 436

 


U.S. Supreme Court

BASSETT v. SMITH, 398 U.S. 435 (1970)

398 U.S. 435

BASSETT v. SMITH, WARDEN
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA
No. 1658, Misc.
Decided June 15, 1970

Certiorari granted; 226 Ga. 10, 172 S.E.2d 407, vacated and remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Georgia affirming the denial of habeas corpus is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration after petitioner has been afforded adequate access to a copy of the transcript of the trial court hearing on his petition for habeas corpus. Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477 (1963); Long v. District Court, 385 U.S. 192 (1966); cf. Wade v. Wilson, 396 U.S. 282 (1970).

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL and MR. JUSTICE BLACKMUN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 398 U.S. 435, 436

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.