FOLLETTE v. COMACHO
398 U.S. 279 (1970)
Annotate this Case
- Syllabus |
- Case
U.S. Supreme Court
FOLLETTE v. COMACHO, 398 U.S. 279 (1970)
398 U.S. 279 FOLLETTE, WARDEN v. COMACHO
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE SECOND CIRCUIT No. 1394.
Decided June 1, 1970
Certiorari granted; 421 F.2d 822, vacated and remanded.
PER CURIAM.
The motion of the respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759.
MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
HIGGINS v. UNITED STATES, 398 U.S. 279 (1970)
398 U.S. 279 HIGGINS v. UNITED STATES
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE SECOND CIRCUIT No. 1183, Misc.
Decided June 1, 1970
Certiorari granted; 416 F.2d 406, vacated and remanded.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Gutknecht v. United States, 396 U.S. 295.
MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.