MRKONJIC-RUZIC v. UNITED STATES, 394 U.S. 454 (1969)

U.S. Supreme Court

MRKONJIC-RUZIC v. UNITED STATES, 394 U.S. 454 (1969) 394 U.S. 454

MRKONJIC-RUZIC v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED
STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 880.
Decided April 1, 1969.

Certiorari granted; 402 F.2d 836, vacated and remanded.

Gregory S. Stout for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Kossack, and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California for further consideration in light of Alderman v. United States, ante, p. 165.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents.

NICKOLICH v. OHIO, <a href="/cases/federal/us/394/454/">394 U.S. 454</a> (1969) 394 U.S. 454 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

NICKOLICH v. OHIO, 394 U.S. 454 (1969) 394 U.S. 454

NICKOLICH v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 1052.
Decided April 1, 1969.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

George E. Tyack for appellant.

E. Raymond Morehart for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 394 U.S. 454, 455

 


U.S. Supreme Court

MRKONJIC-RUZIC v. UNITED STATES, 394 U.S. 454 (1969) 394 U.S. 454

MRKONJIC-RUZIC v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED
STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 880.
Decided April 1, 1969.

Certiorari granted; 402 F.2d 836, vacated and remanded.

Gregory S. Stout for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Kossack, and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California for further consideration in light of Alderman v. United States, ante, p. 165.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents.

NICKOLICH v. OHIO, <a href="/cases/federal/us/394/454/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/394/454/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/394/454/">394 U.S. 454</a></a></a> (1969) 394 U.S. 454 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

NICKOLICH v. OHIO, 394 U.S. 454 (1969) 394 U.S. 454

NICKOLICH v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 1052.
Decided April 1, 1969.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

George E. Tyack for appellant.

E. Raymond Morehart for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 394 U.S. 454, 455

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.