CLARK WALTER & SONS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 392 U.S. 659 (1968)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

CLARK WALTER & SONS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 392 U.S. 659 (1968)

392 U.S. 659

CLARK WALTER & SONS, INC. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 1404.
Decided June 17, 1968.

Affirmed.

Howard T. Rosen and William J. O'Shaughnessy for appellant.

Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman, and Howard E. Shapiro for the United States, and Donald B. Kipp and James C. Pitney for Western Electric Co. et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

Page 392 U.S. 659, 660




U.S. Supreme Court

CLARK WALTER & SONS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 392 U.S. 659 (1968)

392 U.S. 659

CLARK WALTER & SONS, INC. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 1404.
Decided June 17, 1968.

Affirmed.

Howard T. Rosen and William J. O'Shaughnessy for appellant.

Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman, and Howard E. Shapiro for the United States, and Donald B. Kipp and James C. Pitney for Western Electric Co. et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

Page 392 U.S. 659, 660

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.