FLOYD & BEASLEY TRANSFER CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES, 385 U.S. 647 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court
FLOYD & BEASLEY TRANSFER CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES, 385 U.S. 647 (1967) 385 U.S. 647FLOYD & BEASLEY TRANSFER CO., INC.
v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN
DISTRICT OF
ALABAMA. No. 702.
Decided January 23, 1967.
256 F. Supp. 23, affirmed.
John W. Cooper for appellant.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al.; Guy H. Postell for Akers Motor Lines, Inc., et al.; and Harold Hernly, Robert E. Joyner and Ormond Somerville for Alabama Highway Express, Inc., et al., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
385 U.S. 647 (1967) 385 U.S. 647 (1967) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, 385 U.S. 647 (1967) 385 U.S. 647SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND
APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 797.
Decided January 23, 1967.
242 Cal. App. 2d 38, 51 Cal. Rptr. 197, appeal dismissed.
Randolph Karr and Alan L. Freedman for appellant.
Roger Arnebergh and Bourke Jones for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
FLOYD & BEASLEY TRANSFER CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES, 385 U.S. 647 (1967) 385 U.S. 647 FLOYD & BEASLEY TRANSFER CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ALABAMA. No. 702.
Decided January 23, 1967.
256 F. Supp. 23, affirmed. John W. Cooper for appellant. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al.; Guy H. Postell for Akers Motor Lines, Inc., et al.; and Harold Hernly, Robert E. Joyner and Ormond Somerville for Alabama Highway Express, Inc., et al., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
385 U.S. 647 (1967) 385 U.S. 647 (1967) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, 385 U.S. 647 (1967) 385 U.S. 647 SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 797.
Decided January 23, 1967.
242 Cal. App. 2d 38, 51 Cal. Rptr. 197, appeal dismissed. Randolph Karr and Alan L. Freedman for appellant. Roger Arnebergh and Bourke Jones for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 385 U.S. 647, 648
