VENABLE v. TEXAS
384 U.S. 266 (1966)

 Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

VENABLE v. TEXAS, 384 U.S. 266 (1966)

384 U.S. 266

VENABLE v. TEXAS.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS.
No. 1196.
Decided May 23, 1966.

397 S. W. 2d 231, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

William VanDercreek for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 384 U.S. 266, 267

WYLAN v. CALIFORNIA, <a href="/cases/federal/us/384/266/case.html">384 U.S. 266</a> (1966) 384 U.S. 266 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

WYLAN v. CALIFORNIA, 384 U.S. 266 (1966)

384 U.S. 266

WYLAN v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. No. 991.
Decided May 23, 1966.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Ronald H. Bonaparte and David A. Binder for appellant.

Byron B. Gentry for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.




Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.