SHANNON v. SEQUEECHI, 384 U.S. 101 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court
SHANNON v. SEQUEECHI, 384 U.S. 101 (1966) 384 U.S. 101 SHANNON, AKA KELLY v. SEQUEECHI, SHERIFF, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
OKLAHOMA. No. 1261, Misc.
Decided April 25, 1966.
Appeal dismissed.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
U.S. Supreme Court
PRENSKY v. GELLER, 384 U.S. 101 (1966) 384 U.S. 101PRENSKY v. GELLER, JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. No. 1273, Misc.
Decided April 25, 1966.
22 App. Div. 2d 559, 257 N.Y.S.2d 492, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Basil R. Pollitt for appellant.
Frank S. Hogan for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
SHANNON v. SEQUEECHI, 384 U.S. 101 (1966) 384 U.S. 101 SHANNON, AKA KELLY v. SEQUEECHI, SHERIFF, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
OKLAHOMA. No. 1261, Misc.
Decided April 25, 1966.
Appeal dismissed.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
U.S. Supreme Court
PRENSKY v. GELLER, 384 U.S. 101 (1966) 384 U.S. 101PRENSKY v. GELLER, JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. No. 1273, Misc.
Decided April 25, 1966.
22 App. Div. 2d 559, 257 N.Y.S.2d 492, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Basil R. Pollitt for appellant.
Frank S. Hogan for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Page 384 U.S. 101, 102
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
