MILLER v. VIRGINIA, 383 U.S. 831 (1966)

U.S. Supreme Court

MILLER v. VIRGINIA, 383 U.S. 831 (1966)

383 U.S. 831

MILLER v. VIRGINIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA.
No. 196, Misc.
Decided April 4, 1966.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellant pro se.

Reno S. Harp III, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that in treating the papers as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari should be granted.


DRUM v. SEAWELL, <a href="/cases/federal/us/383/831/case.html">383 U.S. 831</a> (1966) 383 U.S. 831 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

DRUM v. SEAWELL, 383 U.S. 831 (1966)

383 U.S. 831

DRUM ET AL. v. SEAWELL, CHAIRMAN OF THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE
BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 1128.
Decided April 4, 1966.

249 F. Supp. 877, affirmed.

Louis Rabil and Robinson O. Everett for appellants.

T. Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, James F. Bullock, Assistant Attorney General, and Thomas L. Young for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to advance and expedite consideration is granted. The judgment is affirmed.

Page 383 U.S. 831, 832




U.S. Supreme Court

MILLER v. VIRGINIA, 383 U.S. 831 (1966)

383 U.S. 831

MILLER v. VIRGINIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA.
No. 196, Misc.
Decided April 4, 1966.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellant pro se.

Reno S. Harp III, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that in treating the papers as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari should be granted.


DRUM v. SEAWELL, <a href="/cases/federal/us/383/831/case.html">383 U.S. 831</a> (1966) 383 U.S. 831 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

DRUM v. SEAWELL, 383 U.S. 831 (1966)

383 U.S. 831

DRUM ET AL. v. SEAWELL, CHAIRMAN OF THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE
BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 1128.
Decided April 4, 1966.

249 F. Supp. 877, affirmed.

Louis Rabil and Robinson O. Everett for appellants.

T. Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, James F. Bullock, Assistant Attorney General, and Thomas L. Young for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to advance and expedite consideration is granted. The judgment is affirmed.

Page 383 U.S. 831, 832

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.