ATLANTIC GULF & PACIFIC CO. v. GEROSA, 382 U.S. 368 (1966)

U.S. Supreme Court

ATLANTIC GULF & PACIFIC CO. v. GEROSA, 382 U.S. 368 (1966) 382 U.S. 368

ATLANTIC GULF & PACIFIC CO. v. GEROSA, COMPTROLLER OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 718.
Decided January 17, 1966.

 16 N.Y.2d 1, 209 N.E.2d 86, appeal dismissed.

Richard H. Appert for appellant.

Leo A. Larkin, Stanley Buchsbaum and Samuel J. Warms for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 382 U.S. 368, 369

PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/382/368/">382 U.S. 368</a> (1966) 382 U.S. 368 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES, 382 U.S. 368 (1966) 382 U.S. 368

PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
PENNSYLVANIA. No. 556.
Decided January 17, 1966.

Affirmed.

Paul R. Duke and Edward A. Kaier for appellants.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert B. Hummel, Neil Brooks, Robert W. Ginnane and I. K. Hay for the United States et al. Leo A. Larkin, Samuel Mandell, Sidney Goldstein, F. A. Mulhern, Arthur L. Winn, Jr., Samuel H. Moerman, J. Raymond Clark and James M. Henderson for appellee Port of New York Authority.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

 


U.S. Supreme Court

ATLANTIC GULF & PACIFIC CO. v. GEROSA, 382 U.S. 368 (1966) 382 U.S. 368

ATLANTIC GULF & PACIFIC CO. v. GEROSA, COMPTROLLER OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 718.
Decided January 17, 1966.

 16 N.Y.2d 1, 209 N.E.2d 86, appeal dismissed.

Richard H. Appert for appellant.

Leo A. Larkin, Stanley Buchsbaum and Samuel J. Warms for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 382 U.S. 368, 369

PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/382/368/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/382/368/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/382/368/">382 U.S. 368</a></a></a> (1966) 382 U.S. 368 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES, 382 U.S. 368 (1966) 382 U.S. 368

PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
PENNSYLVANIA. No. 556.
Decided January 17, 1966.

Affirmed.

Paul R. Duke and Edward A. Kaier for appellants.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert B. Hummel, Neil Brooks, Robert W. Ginnane and I. K. Hay for the United States et al. Leo A. Larkin, Samuel Mandell, Sidney Goldstein, F. A. Mulhern, Arthur L. Winn, Jr., Samuel H. Moerman, J. Raymond Clark and James M. Henderson for appellee Port of New York Authority.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.