CHICAGO & N.W. R.W. v. CHICAGO MIL. ST. PAUL & PAC. R.
380 U.S. 448 (1965)
Annotate this Case
- Syllabus |
- Case
U.S. Supreme Court
CHICAGO & N.W. R.W. v. CHICAGO MIL. ST. PAUL & PAC. R., 380 U.S. 448 (1965)
380 U.S. 448 CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY CO. v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL &
PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
WISCONSIN.
No. 21.Argued November 17, 1964.
Decided April 5, 1965.
214 F. Supp. 244, reversed.
John C. Danielson argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Jordan Jay Hillman.
Frank M. Long argued the cause for appellees. With him on the brief were Philip H. Porter, R. K. Merrill and Richard R. Robinson.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane and Arthur Cerra filed a memorandum for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is reversed. Texas & P. R. Co. v. Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co., 270 U.S. 266, 278.
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.
