ABERNATHY v. ALABAMA, 380 U.S. 447 (1965)

U.S. Supreme Court

ABERNATHY v. ALABAMA, 380 U.S. 447 (1965)

380 U.S. 447

ABERNATHY ET AL. v. ALABAMA.
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF ALABAMA.
No. 9.
Argued October 12-13, 1964.
Decided April 5, 1965.

42 Ala. App. 149, 155 So.2d 586, reversed.

Louis H. Pollak argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, James M. Nabrit III, Fred D. Gray and Charles S. Conley.

Leslie Hall, Assistant Attorney General of Alabama, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Richmond M. Flowers, Attorney General of Alabama.

PER CURIAM.

The judgments are reversed. Boynton v. Virginia, 364 U.S. 454.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 380 U.S. 447, 448




U.S. Supreme Court

ABERNATHY v. ALABAMA, 380 U.S. 447 (1965)

380 U.S. 447

ABERNATHY ET AL. v. ALABAMA.
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF ALABAMA.
No. 9.
Argued October 12-13, 1964.
Decided April 5, 1965.

42 Ala. App. 149, 155 So.2d 586, reversed.

Louis H. Pollak argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, James M. Nabrit III, Fred D. Gray and Charles S. Conley.

Leslie Hall, Assistant Attorney General of Alabama, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Richmond M. Flowers, Attorney General of Alabama.

PER CURIAM.

The judgments are reversed. Boynton v. Virginia, 364 U.S. 454.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 380 U.S. 447, 448

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.