TANCIL v. WOOLLS
Annotate this Case
379 U.S. 19 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court
TANCIL v. WOOLLS, 379 U.S. 19 (1964)379 U.S. 19
TANCIL ET AL. v. WOOLLS ET AL., JUDGES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
VIRGINIA. No. 386.
Decided October 26, 1964.*
[Footnote *] Together with No. 412, Virginia Board of Elections et al. v. Hamm et al., also on appeal from the same court.
230 F. Supp. 156, affirmed.
Allison W. Brown, Jr., for appellants in No. 386 and for appellees in No. 412.
Robert Y. Button, Attorney General of Virginia, R. D. McIlwaine III, Assistant Attorney General, William J. Hassan and Ralph G. Louk for appellants in No. 412.
The motion to affirm in No. 412 is granted and the judgment in both cases is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted in both cases.
MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted in No. 386.
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.