INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM WORKERS, AMERICA, v. AMERICAN OIL, 379 U.S. 130 (1964)
Argued:
November 9, 1964
Decided:
November 23, 1964
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM WORKERS, AMERICA, v. AMERICAN OIL, 379 U.S. 130 (1964) 379 U.S. 130INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM WORKERS OF
AMERICA, INC. v. AMERICAN OIL CO.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH
CIRCUIT.
No. 55.
Argued November 9, 1964.
Decided November 23, 1964.
324 F.2d 903, affirmed by an equally divided Court.
David E. Feller argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were William Belshaw, Benedict R. Danko, Elliot Bredhoff, Jerry D. Anker and Michael H. Gottesman.
Frederic D. Anderson argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Richard P. Tinkham and Daniel F. Kelly.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Opinions
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.
No. 55.
Argued November 9, 1964.
Decided November 23, 1964.
324 F.2d 903, affirmed by an equally divided Court. David E. Feller argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were William Belshaw, Benedict R. Danko, Elliot Bredhoff, Jerry D. Anker and Michael H. Gottesman. Frederic D. Anderson argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Richard P. Tinkham and Daniel F. Kelly. PER CURIAM. The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court. MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Page 379 U.S. 130, 131
U.S. Supreme Court
INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM WORKERS, AMERICA, v. AMERICAN OIL, 379 U.S. 130 (1964) 379 U.S. 130 INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM WORKERS OF AMERICA, INC. v. AMERICAN OIL CO.CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.
No. 55.
Argued November 9, 1964.
Decided November 23, 1964.
324 F.2d 903, affirmed by an equally divided Court. David E. Feller argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were William Belshaw, Benedict R. Danko, Elliot Bredhoff, Jerry D. Anker and Michael H. Gottesman. Frederic D. Anderson argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Richard P. Tinkham and Daniel F. Kelly. PER CURIAM. The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court. MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Page 379 U.S. 130, 131
Search This Case
