WILLIAMS v. NORTH CAROLINA, 378 U.S. 548 (1964)

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

WILLIAMS v. NORTH CAROLINA, 378 U.S. 548 (1964) 378 U.S. 548

WILLIAMS v. NORTH CAROLINA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA.
No. 4.
Decided June 22, 1964.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 253 N.C. 804, 117 S.E.2d 824.

Leonard B. Boudin, Victor Rabinowitz and Conrad J. Lynn for petitioner.

T. W. Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Ralph Moody, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.


Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

WILLIAMS v. NORTH CAROLINA, 378 U.S. 548 (1964) 378 U.S. 548 WILLIAMS v. NORTH CAROLINA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA.
No. 4.
Decided June 22, 1964.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 253 N.C. 804, 117 S.E.2d 824.

Leonard B. Boudin, Victor Rabinowitz and Conrad J. Lynn for petitioner.

T. W. Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Ralph Moody, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment vacated and the case remanded to the Supreme Court of North Carolina for consideration in light of Robinson v. Florida, ante, p. 153.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS would reverse outright on the basis of the views expressed in his opinion in Bell v. Maryland, ante, p. 242.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent.

Page 378 U.S. 548, 549