TACOMA ASSOCIATION OF CREDIT MEN v. WASHINGTON, 377 U.S. 532 (1964)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
TACOMA ASSOCIATION OF CREDIT MEN v. WASHINGTON, 377 U.S. 532 (1964) 377 U.S. 532TACOMA ASSOCIATION OF CREDIT MEN v.
WASHINGTON.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 995.
Decided June 8, 1964.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 62 Wash. 2d 534, 383 P.2d 910.
Ofell H. Johnson for appellant.
John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and James A. Furber and Henry W. Wager, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 995.
Decided June 8, 1964.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 62 Wash. 2d 534, 383 P.2d 910. Ofell H. Johnson for appellant. John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and James A. Furber and Henry W. Wager, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 377 U.S. 532, 533
U.S. Supreme Court
TACOMA ASSOCIATION OF CREDIT MEN v. WASHINGTON, 377 U.S. 532 (1964) 377 U.S. 532 TACOMA ASSOCIATION OF CREDIT MEN v. WASHINGTON.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 995.
Decided June 8, 1964.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 62 Wash. 2d 534, 383 P.2d 910. Ofell H. Johnson for appellant. John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and James A. Furber and Henry W. Wager, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 377 U.S. 532, 533
Search This Case
