DREXEL v. OHIO PARDON AND PAROLE COMMISSION, 373 U.S. 377 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court
DREXEL v. OHIO PARDON AND PAROLE COMMISSION, 373 U.S. 377 (1963) 373 U.S. 377 DREXEL v. OHIO PARDON AND PAROLE COMMISSION.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
OHIO. No. 975, Misc.
Decided May 20, 1963.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed.
U.S. Supreme Court
ATWOOD'S TRANSPORT LINES, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 373 U.S. 377 (1963) 373 U.S. 377 ATWOOD'S TRANSPORT LINES, INC., v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
No. 935.
Decided May 20, 1963.
211 F. Supp. 168, affirmed.
James E. Wilson and Edward G. Villalon for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Lionel Kestenbaum and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission; and S. Harrison Kahn for Alexandria, Barcroft & Washington Transit Co., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
DREXEL v. OHIO PARDON AND PAROLE COMMISSION, 373 U.S. 377 (1963) 373 U.S. 377 DREXEL v. OHIO PARDON AND PAROLE COMMISSION.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
OHIO. No. 975, Misc.
Decided May 20, 1963.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed.
Page 373 U.S. 377, 378
U.S. Supreme Court
ATWOOD'S TRANSPORT LINES, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 373 U.S. 377 (1963) 373 U.S. 377 ATWOOD'S TRANSPORT LINES, INC., v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
No. 935.
Decided May 20, 1963.
211 F. Supp. 168, affirmed.
James E. Wilson and Edward G. Villalon for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Lionel Kestenbaum and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission; and S. Harrison Kahn for Alexandria, Barcroft & Washington Transit Co., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.