HARTMAN v. UNITED STATES, 370 U.S. 724 (1962)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

HARTMAN v. UNITED STATES, 370 U.S. 724 (1962)

370 U.S. 724

HARTMAN v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 447, Misc.
Decided June 25, 1962.

Certiorari granted; judgment reversed.

Reported below: 290 F.2d 460.

Lawrence Speiser for petitioner.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Yeagley and George B. Searls for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the motion for leave to supplement the petition for certiorari and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Russell v. United States, 369 U.S. 749; Silber v. United States, ante, p. 717.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER and MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Russell v. United States, 369 U.S. 749, 779, 781.

Page 370 U.S. 724, 725

 


U.S. Supreme Court

HARTMAN v. UNITED STATES, 370 U.S. 724 (1962)

370 U.S. 724

HARTMAN v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 447, Misc.
Decided June 25, 1962.

Certiorari granted; judgment reversed.

Reported below: 290 F.2d 460.

Lawrence Speiser for petitioner.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Yeagley and George B. Searls for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the motion for leave to supplement the petition for certiorari and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Russell v. United States, 369 U.S. 749; Silber v. United States, ante, p. 717.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER and MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Russell v. United States, 369 U.S. 749, 779, 781.

Page 370 U.S. 724, 725

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.