GRUMMAN v. UNITED STATES, 370 U.S. 288 (1962)

U.S. Supreme Court

GRUMMAN v. UNITED STATES, 370 U.S. 288 (1962)

370 U.S. 288

GRUMMAN v. UNITED STATES.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 436.
Argued April 19, 1962.
Decided June 18, 1962.

Judgment reversed on the authority of Russell v. United States, 369 U.S. 749.

Reported below: 111 U.S. App. D.C. 79, 294 F.2d 708.

David Rein argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Joseph Forer.

Bruce J. Terris argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Yeagley and Kevin T. Maroney.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed. Russell v. United States, 369 U.S. 749.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Russell v. United States, 369 U.S. 749, 779, 781.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the decision of this case.

Page 370 U.S. 288, 289




U.S. Supreme Court

GRUMMAN v. UNITED STATES, 370 U.S. 288 (1962)

370 U.S. 288

GRUMMAN v. UNITED STATES.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 436.
Argued April 19, 1962.
Decided June 18, 1962.

Judgment reversed on the authority of Russell v. United States, 369 U.S. 749.

Reported below: 111 U.S. App. D.C. 79, 294 F.2d 708.

David Rein argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Joseph Forer.

Bruce J. Terris argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Yeagley and Kevin T. Maroney.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed. Russell v. United States, 369 U.S. 749.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Russell v. United States, 369 U.S. 749, 779, 781.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the decision of this case.

Page 370 U.S. 288, 289

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.