VERRET v. OIL TRANSPORT CO., INC., 365 U.S. 768 (1961)

U.S. Supreme Court

VERRET v. OIL TRANSPORT CO., INC., 365 U.S. 768 (1961)

365 U.S. 768

VERRET ET AL. v. OIL TRANSPORT CO., INC., ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.
No. 388.
Decided April 17, 1961.

Consent judgment having been entered by District Court since reversal by Court of Appeals, judgment of Court of Appeals vacated and case remanded with directions to dismiss appeal as moot.

Reported below: 278 F.2d 464.

James J. Morrison, Arthur A. de la Houssaye and Raymond H. Kierr for petitioners.

Eberhard P. Deutsch for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

It appearing from the joint suggestion of mootness that, subsequent to the judgment of reversal by the Court of Appeals of the judgment of the District Court and the filing and granting of the petition for writ of certiorari, a consent judgment was entered by the District Court and that said judgment has been satisfied, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with directions to dismiss the appeal as moot.

Page 365 U.S. 768, 769




U.S. Supreme Court

VERRET v. OIL TRANSPORT CO., INC., 365 U.S. 768 (1961)

365 U.S. 768

VERRET ET AL. v. OIL TRANSPORT CO., INC., ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.
No. 388.
Decided April 17, 1961.

Consent judgment having been entered by District Court since reversal by Court of Appeals, judgment of Court of Appeals vacated and case remanded with directions to dismiss appeal as moot.

Reported below: 278 F.2d 464.

James J. Morrison, Arthur A. de la Houssaye and Raymond H. Kierr for petitioners.

Eberhard P. Deutsch for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

It appearing from the joint suggestion of mootness that, subsequent to the judgment of reversal by the Court of Appeals of the judgment of the District Court and the filing and granting of the petition for writ of certiorari, a consent judgment was entered by the District Court and that said judgment has been satisfied, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with directions to dismiss the appeal as moot.

Page 365 U.S. 768, 769

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.