VILLAGE OF RIDGEFIELD PARK v. BERGEN COUNTY BD. OF TAX., 365 U.S. 648 (1961)

U.S. Supreme Court

VILLAGE OF RIDGEFIELD PARK v. BERGEN COUNTY BD. OF TAX., 365 U.S. 648 (1961)

365 U.S. 648

VILLAGE OF RIDGEFIELD PARK ET AL. v. BERGEN COUNTY BOARD OF TAXATION ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 674.
Decided April 3, 1961.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 31 N. J. 420, 157 A. 2d 829; 33 N. J. 262, 163 A. 2d 144.

William R. Morrison for appellants.

David D. Furman, Attorney General of New Jersey, Theodore I. Botter, Assistant Attorney General, and Milton T. Lasher for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 365 U.S. 648, 649




U.S. Supreme Court

VILLAGE OF RIDGEFIELD PARK v. BERGEN COUNTY BD. OF TAX., 365 U.S. 648 (1961)

365 U.S. 648

VILLAGE OF RIDGEFIELD PARK ET AL. v. BERGEN COUNTY BOARD OF TAXATION ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 674.
Decided April 3, 1961.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 31 N. J. 420, 157 A. 2d 829; 33 N. J. 262, 163 A. 2d 144.

William R. Morrison for appellants.

David D. Furman, Attorney General of New Jersey, Theodore I. Botter, Assistant Attorney General, and Milton T. Lasher for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 365 U.S. 648, 649

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.