TURPENTINE & ROSIN FACTORS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 365 U.S. 298 (1961)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

TURPENTINE & ROSIN FACTORS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 365 U.S. 298 (1961) 365 U.S. 298

TURPENTINE & ROSIN FACTORS, INC., v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
GEORGIA. No. 556.
Decided February 20, 1961.

192 F. Supp. 256, affirmed.

E. Way Highsmith and J. H. Highsmith for appellant.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Bicks and Richard A. Solomon for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

NATIONAL PSYCHOLOGICAL ASS'N v. UNIV. OF NEW YORK, <a href="/cases/federal/us/365/298/case.html">365 U.S. 298</a> (1961) 365 U.S. 298 (1961) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

NATIONAL PSYCHOLOGICAL ASS'N v. UNIV. OF NEW YORK, 365 U.S. 298 (1961) 365 U.S. 298

NATIONAL PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION FOR PSYCHOANALYSIS, INC., ET AL. v.
UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 568.
Decided February 20, 1961.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 8 N. Y. 2d 197, 168 N. E. 2d 649.

Lyman Stansky for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, and Samuel A. Hirshowitz and Philip Watson, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 365 U.S. 298, 299




U.S. Supreme Court

TURPENTINE & ROSIN FACTORS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 365 U.S. 298 (1961) 365 U.S. 298

TURPENTINE & ROSIN FACTORS, INC., v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
GEORGIA. No. 556.
Decided February 20, 1961.

192 F. Supp. 256, affirmed.

E. Way Highsmith and J. H. Highsmith for appellant.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Bicks and Richard A. Solomon for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

NATIONAL PSYCHOLOGICAL ASS'N v. UNIV. OF NEW YORK, <a href="/cases/federal/us/365/298/case.html">365 U.S. 298</a> (1961) 365 U.S. 298 (1961) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

NATIONAL PSYCHOLOGICAL ASS'N v. UNIV. OF NEW YORK, 365 U.S. 298 (1961) 365 U.S. 298

NATIONAL PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION FOR PSYCHOANALYSIS, INC., ET AL. v.
UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 568.
Decided February 20, 1961.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 8 N. Y. 2d 197, 168 N. E. 2d 649.

Lyman Stansky for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, and Samuel A. Hirshowitz and Philip Watson, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 365 U.S. 298, 299

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.