TURPENTINE & ROSIN FACTORS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 365 U.S. 298 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court
TURPENTINE & ROSIN FACTORS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 365 U.S. 298 (1961) 365 U.S. 298 TURPENTINE & ROSIN FACTORS, INC., v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
GEORGIA. No. 556.
Decided February 20, 1961.
192 F. Supp. 256, affirmed.
E. Way Highsmith and J. H. Highsmith for appellant.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Bicks and Richard A. Solomon for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
NATIONAL PSYCHOLOGICAL ASS'N v. UNIV. OF NEW YORK, 365 U.S. 298 (1961) 365 U.S. 298 NATIONAL PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION FOR PSYCHOANALYSIS, INC., ET AL. v.
UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 568.
Decided February 20, 1961.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 8 N.Y.2d 197, 168 N.E.2d 649.
Lyman Stansky for appellants.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, and Samuel A. Hirshowitz and Philip Watson, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
TURPENTINE & ROSIN FACTORS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 365 U.S. 298 (1961) 365 U.S. 298 TURPENTINE & ROSIN FACTORS, INC., v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
GEORGIA. No. 556.
Decided February 20, 1961.
192 F. Supp. 256, affirmed.
E. Way Highsmith and J. H. Highsmith for appellant.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Bicks and Richard A. Solomon for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
NATIONAL PSYCHOLOGICAL ASS'N v. UNIV. OF NEW YORK, 365 U.S. 298 (1961) 365 U.S. 298 NATIONAL PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION FOR PSYCHOANALYSIS, INC., ET AL. v.
UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 568.
Decided February 20, 1961.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 8 N.Y.2d 197, 168 N.E.2d 649.
Lyman Stansky for appellants.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, and Samuel A. Hirshowitz and Philip Watson, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Page 365 U.S. 298, 299
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
