NEW YORK v. McCLOSKEY, 361 U.S. 534 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court
NEW YORK v. McCLOSKEY, 361 U.S. 534 (1960) 361 U.S. 534NEW YORK EX REL. VALENTI v. McCLOSKEY,
SHERIFF, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 563.
Decided February 23, 1960.
Appeal dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.
Reported below: 6 N.Y.2d 390, 160 N.E.2d 647.
Gilbert S. Rosenthal for appellant.
Eliot H. Lumbard and Nathan Skolnik for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.
361 U.S. 534 (1960) 361 U.S. 534 (1960) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
NATIONAL CAN CORP. v. STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, 361 U.S. 534 (1960) 361 U.S. 534NATIONAL CAN CORP. v. STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MARYLAND.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 564.
Decided February 23, 1960.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 220 Md. 418, 153 A.2d 287.
Herbert M. Brune for appellant.
C. Ferdinand Sybert, Attorney General of Maryland, and John Martin Jones, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
NEW YORK v. McCLOSKEY, 361 U.S. 534 (1960) 361 U.S. 534 NEW YORK EX REL. VALENTI v. McCLOSKEY, SHERIFF, ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 563.
Decided February 23, 1960.
Appeal dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question. Reported below: 6 N.Y.2d 390, 160 N.E.2d 647. Gilbert S. Rosenthal for appellant. Eliot H. Lumbard and Nathan Skolnik for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.
361 U.S. 534 (1960) 361 U.S. 534 (1960) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
NATIONAL CAN CORP. v. STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, 361 U.S. 534 (1960) 361 U.S. 534 NATIONAL CAN CORP. v. STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MARYLAND.APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 564.
Decided February 23, 1960.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 220 Md. 418, 153 A.2d 287. Herbert M. Brune for appellant. C. Ferdinand Sybert, Attorney General of Maryland, and John Martin Jones, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 361 U.S. 534, 535
