UNITED STATES v. HINE PONTIAC, 360 U.S. 715 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court
UNITED STATES v. HINE PONTIAC, 360 U.S. 715 (1959)
360 U.S. 715 UNITED STATES ET AL. v. HINE PONTIAC ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 561.
Decided June 29, 1959.
Certiorari granted and judgments reversed.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice, Joseph F. Goetten and Carolyn R. Just for petitioners.
Paul J. Sedgwick and L. W. Anderson for Hine Pontiac, M. M. Wade for Modern Olds, Inc., and Michael J. Salmon and Vincent F. Kilborn for Kilborn et al., respondents.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgments of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit are reversed. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Hansen, ante, p. 446; Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Glover, ante, p. 446; Baird v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, ante, p. 446.
U.S. Supreme Court
UNITED STATES v. HINE PONTIAC, 360 U.S. 715 (1959)
360 U.S. 715 UNITED STATES ET AL. v. HINE PONTIAC ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 561.
Decided June 29, 1959.
Certiorari granted and judgments reversed.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice, Joseph F. Goetten and Carolyn R. Just for petitioners.
Paul J. Sedgwick and L. W. Anderson for Hine Pontiac, M. M. Wade for Modern Olds, Inc., and Michael J. Salmon and Vincent F. Kilborn for Kilborn et al., respondents.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgments of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit are reversed. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Hansen, ante, p. 446; Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Glover, ante, p. 446; Baird v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, ante, p. 446.
Page 360 U.S. 715, 716
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.