UNITED STATES v. HINE PONTIAC, 360 U.S. 715 (1959)

U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED STATES v. HINE PONTIAC, 360 U.S. 715 (1959)

360 U.S. 715

UNITED STATES ET AL. v. HINE PONTIAC ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 561.
Decided June 29, 1959.

Certiorari granted and judgments reversed.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice, Joseph F. Goetten and Carolyn R. Just for petitioners.

Paul J. Sedgwick and L. W. Anderson for Hine Pontiac, M. M. Wade for Modern Olds, Inc., and Michael J. Salmon and Vincent F. Kilborn for Kilborn et al., respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgments of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit are reversed. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Hansen, ante, p. 446; Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Glover, ante, p. 446; Baird v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, ante, p. 446.

Page 360 U.S. 715, 716




U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED STATES v. HINE PONTIAC, 360 U.S. 715 (1959)

360 U.S. 715

UNITED STATES ET AL. v. HINE PONTIAC ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 561.
Decided June 29, 1959.

Certiorari granted and judgments reversed.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice, Joseph F. Goetten and Carolyn R. Just for petitioners.

Paul J. Sedgwick and L. W. Anderson for Hine Pontiac, M. M. Wade for Modern Olds, Inc., and Michael J. Salmon and Vincent F. Kilborn for Kilborn et al., respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgments of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit are reversed. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Hansen, ante, p. 446; Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Glover, ante, p. 446; Baird v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, ante, p. 446.

Page 360 U.S. 715, 716

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.