PETERSEN v. CALIFORNIA, 360 U.S. 314 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court
PETERSEN v. CALIFORNIA, 360 U.S. 314 (1959) 360 U.S. 314PETERSEN v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 830.
Decided June 15, 1959.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 51 Cal. 2d 177, 331 P.2d 24.
Marvin E. Lewis for appellant.
Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Clarence A. Linn, Assistant Attorney General, Arlo E. Smith, Deputy Attorney General, Dion Holm and George Baglin for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
360 U.S. 314 (1959) 360 U.S. 314 (1959) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
ORTEGA v. BIBB, 360 U.S. 314 (1959) 360 U.S. 314ORTEGA v. BIBB, DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY,
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN
DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 790, Misc.
Decided June 15, 1959.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed.
U.S. Supreme Court
PETERSEN v. CALIFORNIA, 360 U.S. 314 (1959) 360 U.S. 314 PETERSEN v. CALIFORNIA.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 830.
Decided June 15, 1959.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 51 Cal. 2d 177, 331 P.2d 24. Marvin E. Lewis for appellant. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Clarence A. Linn, Assistant Attorney General, Arlo E. Smith, Deputy Attorney General, Dion Holm and George Baglin for appellee. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
360 U.S. 314 (1959) 360 U.S. 314 (1959) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
ORTEGA v. BIBB, 360 U.S. 314 (1959) 360 U.S. 314 ORTEGA v. BIBB, DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY,ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 790, Misc.
Decided June 15, 1959.
PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed. Page 360 U.S. 314, 315
