COMMERCIAL COM. v. P. U. C., 359 U.S. 341 (1959)

U.S. Supreme Court

COMMERCIAL COM. v. P. U. C., 359 U.S. 341 (1959)

359 U.S. 341

COMMERCIAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ET AL. v. PUBLIC UTILITIES
COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 719.
Decided April 27, 1959.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 50 Cal. 2d 512, 327 P.2d 513.

Frederick M. Rowe for appellants.

J. Thomason Phelps for the Public Utilities Commission of California, and Arthur T. George, Eugene M. Prince and Francis R. Kirkham for the Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 359 U.S. 341, 342




U.S. Supreme Court

COMMERCIAL COM. v. P. U. C., 359 U.S. 341 (1959)

359 U.S. 341

COMMERCIAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ET AL. v. PUBLIC UTILITIES
COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 719.
Decided April 27, 1959.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 50 Cal. 2d 512, 327 P.2d 513.

Frederick M. Rowe for appellants.

J. Thomason Phelps for the Public Utilities Commission of California, and Arthur T. George, Eugene M. Prince and Francis R. Kirkham for the Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 359 U.S. 341, 342

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.