WOODY v. UNITED STATES, 359 U.S. 118 (1959)

U.S. Supreme Court

WOODY v. UNITED STATES, 359 U.S. 118 (1959)

359 U.S. 118

WOODY v. UNITED STATES.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
No. 135.
Argued January 14, 1959.
Decided March 23, 1959.

Judgment affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Reported below: 258 F.2d 535.

Clarence O. Woolsey, acting under appointment by the Court, 358 U.S. 802, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.

Beatrice Rosenberg argued the cause for the United States. With her on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Anderson and Robert G. Maysack.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 359 U.S. 118, 119




U.S. Supreme Court

WOODY v. UNITED STATES, 359 U.S. 118 (1959)

359 U.S. 118

WOODY v. UNITED STATES.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
No. 135.
Argued January 14, 1959.
Decided March 23, 1959.

Judgment affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Reported below: 258 F.2d 535.

Clarence O. Woolsey, acting under appointment by the Court, 358 U.S. 802, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.

Beatrice Rosenberg argued the cause for the United States. With her on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Anderson and Robert G. Maysack.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 359 U.S. 118, 119

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.