BOSTON FIVE CENTS SAVINGS BANK v. CITY OF NEW BEDFORD, 358 U.S. 53 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court
BOSTON FIVE CENTS SAVINGS BANK v. CITY OF NEW BEDFORD, 358 U.S. 53 (1958)
358 U.S. 53 BOSTON FIVE CENTS SAVINGS BANK ET AL. v. CITY OF NEW BEDFORD.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, BRISTOL COUNTY.
No. 273.
Decided October 20, 1958.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: See 336 Mass. 651, 148 N. E. 2d 637.
Robert G. Dodge and Harold S. Davis for appellants.
Joseph C. Duggan for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
GRAHAM-WHITE SALES CORP. v. PRIME MANUFACTURING CO., 358 U.S. 53 (1958)
358 U.S. 53 GRAHAM-WHITE SALES CORP. ET AL. v. PRIME MANUFACTURING CO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN.
No. 297.
Decided October 20, 1958.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 3 Wis. 2d 156, 87 N. W. 2d 788.
Maxwell H. Herriott for appellants.
John W. Michael and Herman E. Friedrich for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
BOSTON FIVE CENTS SAVINGS BANK v. CITY OF NEW BEDFORD, 358 U.S. 53 (1958)
358 U.S. 53 BOSTON FIVE CENTS SAVINGS BANK ET AL. v. CITY OF NEW BEDFORD.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, BRISTOL COUNTY.
No. 273.
Decided October 20, 1958.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: See 336 Mass. 651, 148 N. E. 2d 637.
Robert G. Dodge and Harold S. Davis for appellants.
Joseph C. Duggan for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
GRAHAM-WHITE SALES CORP. v. PRIME MANUFACTURING CO., 358 U.S. 53 (1958)
358 U.S. 53 GRAHAM-WHITE SALES CORP. ET AL. v. PRIME MANUFACTURING CO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN.
No. 297.
Decided October 20, 1958.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 3 Wis. 2d 156, 87 N. W. 2d 788.
Maxwell H. Herriott for appellants.
John W. Michael and Herman E. Friedrich for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
