STRAUSS v. UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, 355 U.S. 394 (1958)

U.S. Supreme Court

STRAUSS v. UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, 355 U.S. 394 (1958) 355 U.S. 394

STRAUSS ET AL. v. UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 610.
Decided January 20, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 2 N.Y.2d 464, 141 N.E.2d 595.

Alan Y. Cole for appellants.

Charles A. Brind, Jr. for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

TAYLOR v. KENTUCKY, <a href="/cases/federal/us/355/394/case.html">355 U.S. 394</a> (1958) 355 U.S. 394 (1958) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

TAYLOR v. KENTUCKY, 355 U.S. 394 (1958) 355 U.S. 394

TAYLOR ET AL. v. KENTUCKY.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY.
No. 611.
Decided January 20, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 302 S.W.2d 583.

Alexander H. Sands, Littleton M. Wickham and H. V. Forsyth for appellants.

Jo M. Ferguson, Attorney General of Kentucky, and William F. Simpson, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 355 U.S. 394, 395

 


U.S. Supreme Court

STRAUSS v. UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, 355 U.S. 394 (1958) 355 U.S. 394

STRAUSS ET AL. v. UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 610.
Decided January 20, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 2 N.Y.2d 464, 141 N.E.2d 595.

Alan Y. Cole for appellants.

Charles A. Brind, Jr. for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

TAYLOR v. KENTUCKY, <a href="/cases/federal/us/355/394/case.html"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/355/394/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/355/394/">355 U.S. 394</a></a></a> (1958) 355 U.S. 394 (1958) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

TAYLOR v. KENTUCKY, 355 U.S. 394 (1958) 355 U.S. 394

TAYLOR ET AL. v. KENTUCKY.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY.
No. 611.
Decided January 20, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 302 S.W.2d 583.

Alexander H. Sands, Littleton M. Wickham and H. V. Forsyth for appellants.

Jo M. Ferguson, Attorney General of Kentucky, and William F. Simpson, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 355 U.S. 394, 395

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.