HELVERING v. WOOD, 309 U.S. 637 (1940)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

HELVERING v. WOOD, 309 U.S. 637 (1940)

309 U.S. 637

Guy T. HELVERING, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, petitioner,
v.
Edson T. WOOD, Jr., and Gaylord A. Wood, Trustees, etc.
No. 767.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 8, 1940

Mr. Robert H. Jackson, Atty. Gen., for petitioner.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded to the Circuit Court of Appeals for further proceedings. Helvering v. Brum, 309 U.S. 461, 60 S.Ct. 631, 84 L. Ed. --, decided March 25, 1940.

Granted.


U.S. Supreme Court

HELVERING v. WOOD, 309 U.S. 637 (1940)

309 U.S. 637

Guy T. HELVERING, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, petitioner,
v.
Edson T. WOOD, Jr., and Gaylord A. Wood, Trustees, etc.
No. 767.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 8, 1940

Mr. Robert H. Jackson, Atty. Gen., for petitioner.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded to the Circuit Court of Appeals for further proceedings. Helvering v. Brum, 309 U.S. 461, 60 S.Ct. 631, 84 L. Ed. --, decided March 25, 1940.

Granted.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.