U S EX REL HANDLER v. HILL, 302 U.S. 736 (1937)

U.S. Supreme Court

U S EX REL HANDLER v. HILL, 302 U.S. 736 (1937)

302 U.S. 736

UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Nathan HANDLER, petitioner,
v.
Henry C. HILL, Warden, etc.*
No. 416.

Supreme Court of the United States

November 8, 1937

Mr. Lewis Landes, of New York City, for petitioner.

For opinion below, see 90 F.(2d) 573.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied for the reason that the application for writ of certiorari was not made within the time provided by law. Section 8(a), Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 940 [28 U.S.C.A. 350]).

* Rehearing denied 302 U.S. 779, 58 S.Ct. 280, 82 L.Ed. --.[ U S ex rel Handler v. Hill 302 U.S. 736 (1937) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

U S EX REL HANDLER v. HILL, 302 U.S. 736 (1937)

302 U.S. 736

UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Nathan HANDLER, petitioner,
v.
Henry C. HILL, Warden, etc.*
No. 416.

Supreme Court of the United States

November 8, 1937

Mr. Lewis Landes, of New York City, for petitioner.

For opinion below, see 90 F.(2d) 573.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied for the reason that the application for writ of certiorari was not made within the time provided by law. Section 8(a), Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 940 [28 U.S.C.A. 350]).

* Rehearing denied 302 U.S. 779, 58 S.Ct. 280, 82 L.Ed. --.[ U S ex rel Handler v. Hill 302 U.S. 736 (1937) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.