WAHLGREN v. BAUSCH & LOMB OPTICAL COMPANY, 292 U.S. 639 (1934)

U.S. Supreme Court

WAHLGREN v. BAUSCH & LOMB OPTICAL COMPANY, 292 U.S. 639 (1934)

292 U.S. 639

Roy M. WAHLGREN, petitioner,
v.
BAUSCH & LOMB OPTICAL COMPANY, et al.*
No. 942.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 7, 1934

Mr. Roy M. Wahlgren, pro se.

For opinion below, see 66 F.(2d) 660.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied, for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the papers herein submitted, finds no ground upon which a writ of certiorari should be granted. The petition for writ of certiorari is, therefore, also denied.

* Rehearing denied 292 U.S. 615, 54 S. Ct. 862, 78 L. Ed. --.[ Wahlgren v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Company 292 U.S. 639 (1934) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

WAHLGREN v. BAUSCH & LOMB OPTICAL COMPANY, 292 U.S. 639 (1934)

 292 U.S. 639

Roy M. WAHLGREN, petitioner,
v.
BAUSCH & LOMB OPTICAL COMPANY, et al.*
No. 942.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 7, 1934

Mr. Roy M. Wahlgren, pro se.

For opinion below, see 66 F.(2d) 660.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied, for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the papers herein submitted, finds no ground upon which a writ of certiorari should be granted. The petition for writ of certiorari is, therefore, also denied.

* Rehearing denied 292 U.S. 615, 54 S. Ct. 862, 78 L. Ed. --.[ Wahlgren v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Company 292 U.S. 639 (1934) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.