GUNN v. U S, 271 U.S. 661 (1926)

U.S. Supreme Court

GUNN v. U S, 271 U.S. 661 (1926)

271 U.S. 661

Clement GUNN, petitioner,
v.
The UNITED STATES of America.
No. 1013.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 19, 1926*

Messrs. Vance J. Higgs and James E. Carroll, both of St. Louis, Mo., for petitioner.

Messrs. William D. Mitchell, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., Oscar R. Luhring, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Harry S. Ridgely, of Washington, D. C., for the United States.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Footnotes

[Footnote *] Application under Judicial Code, 240(a) U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1925, 1217, prior to decision by Court of Appeals.[ Gunn v. U S 271 U.S. 661 (1926) ]




U.S. Supreme Court

GUNN v. U S, 271 U.S. 661 (1926)

271 U.S. 661

Clement GUNN, petitioner,
v.
The UNITED STATES of America.
No. 1013.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 19, 1926*

Messrs. Vance J. Higgs and James E. Carroll, both of St. Louis, Mo., for petitioner.

Messrs. William D. Mitchell, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., Oscar R. Luhring, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Harry S. Ridgely, of Washington, D. C., for the United States.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Footnotes

[Footnote *] Application under Judicial Code, 240(a) U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1925, 1217, prior to decision by Court of Appeals.[ Gunn v. U S 271 U.S. 661 (1926) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.