Southern Ry. Co. v. Burlington Lumber Co.,
225 U.S. 99 (1912)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Southern Ry. Co. v. Burlington Lumber Co., 225 U.S. 99 (1912)

Southern Railway Company v. Burlington Lumber Company

No. 236

Argued May 3, 1912

Decided May 27, 1912

225 U.S. 99



Decided on authority of Southern Railway Co. v. Reid, 222 U. S. 424, and Southern Railway Company v. Reid & Beam, 222 U. S. 444.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

Page 225 U. S. 100

MR. JUSTICE HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is an action to recover penalties under a statute of North Carolina for refusal to receive goods for shipment. As the statute is the same that was held bad, so far as it concerns commerce among the states, in Southern R. Co. v. Reid, 222 U. S. 424, and Southern R. Co. v. Reid, 222 U. S. 444, a short statement will be enough. On January 26, 1907, the Burlington Lumber Company tendered to the railway company at Burlington, North Carolina, certain machinery for shipment to Saginaw, Michigan, on a through bill of lading. Saginaw was not on the railway company's line, the company had no rates to Saginaw, and the agent had to delay in order to inquire of his superiors. The result was that the through bill of lading was not issued until April 3. The suit, as we have said, is for the penalty, and nothing else. The supreme court of the state decided against the railway on the same ground that it did in the decisions already reversed. In the circumstances, it seems unnecessary to discuss the case more at length.

Judgment reversed.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.