SASS & CRAWFORD v. THOMAS, 214 U.S. 489 (1909)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
SASS & CRAWFORD v. THOMAS, 214 U.S. 489 (1909)214 U.S. 489
SASS & CRAWFORD, Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
MINNIE THOMAS and Charley Thomas.
No. 112.
March 22, 1909.
Messrs. W. A. Ledbetter and S. T. Bledsoe for plaintiffs in error.
Messrs. A. C. Cruce and W. I. Cruce for defendants in error.
Per Curiam: The Writ of Error is dismissed for want of
jurisdiction, on authority of Laurel Oil & Gas Co. v. Morrison,
212 U.S. 291, 53
L. ed . --, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 394, decided on February 23, last.
Opinions
v.
MINNIE THOMAS and Charley Thomas.
No. 112.
March 22, 1909. Page 214 U.S. 489, 490 Messrs. W. A. Ledbetter and S. T. Bledsoe for plaintiffs in error. Messrs. A. C. Cruce and W. I. Cruce for defendants in error. Per Curiam: The Writ of Error is dismissed for want of jurisdiction, on authority of Laurel Oil & Gas Co. v. Morrison, 212 U.S. 291, 53 L. ed . --, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 394, decided on February 23, last.
U.S. Supreme Court
SASS & CRAWFORD v. THOMAS, 214 U.S. 489 (1909) 214 U.S. 489 SASS & CRAWFORD, Plaintiffs in Error,v.
MINNIE THOMAS and Charley Thomas.
No. 112.
March 22, 1909. Page 214 U.S. 489, 490 Messrs. W. A. Ledbetter and S. T. Bledsoe for plaintiffs in error. Messrs. A. C. Cruce and W. I. Cruce for defendants in error. Per Curiam: The Writ of Error is dismissed for want of jurisdiction, on authority of Laurel Oil & Gas Co. v. Morrison, 212 U.S. 291, 53 L. ed . --, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 394, decided on February 23, last.
Search This Case
