TRAVELERS' INS. CO. v. PREWITT, 200 U.S. 450 (1906)

U.S. Supreme Court

TRAVELERS' INS. CO. v. PREWITT, 200 U.S. 450 (1906)

200 U.S. 450

TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, of Hartford, Connecticut, Plff. in Err.,
v.
HENRY R. PREWITT, Insurance Commissioner of the State of Kentucky.
No. 184.

Argued January 16, 1906.
Decided February 19, 1906.

Messrs. Edmund F. Trabue, John G. Johnson, William Bro Smith, John D. Doolan, and Attilla Cox, Jr., for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. J. H. Hazelrigg, N. B. Hays, H. R. Prewitt, and Hazelrigg & Hazelrigg for defendant in error.

Per Mr. Justice Peckham:

This case involves the same principle as that decided in the foregoing case, and, for the reasons stated in the opinion above, the writ of error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Kentucky is dismissed.[ Travelers' Ins Co v. Prewitt 200 U.S. 450 (1906) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

TRAVELERS' INS. CO. v. PREWITT, 200 U.S. 450 (1906)

200 U.S. 450

TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, of Hartford, Connecticut, Plff. in Err.,
v.
HENRY R. PREWITT, Insurance Commissioner of the State of Kentucky.
No. 184.

Argued January 16, 1906.
Decided February 19, 1906.

Messrs. Edmund F. Trabue, John G. Johnson, William Bro Smith, John D. Doolan, and Attilla Cox, Jr., for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. J. H. Hazelrigg, N. B. Hays, H. R. Prewitt, and Hazelrigg & Hazelrigg for defendant in error.

Per Mr. Justice Peckham:

This case involves the same principle as that decided in the foregoing case, and, for the reasons stated in the opinion above, the writ of error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Kentucky is dismissed.[ Travelers' Ins Co v. Prewitt 200 U.S. 450 (1906) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.